From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: translation-table-for-input
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:59:07 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LUI3f-0003W8-Vd@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <jwvhc3d96gq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233655339 2093 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2009 10:02:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:02:19 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 03 11:03:33 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LUI7r-0008Qc-9I
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:03:27 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55506 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LUI6Y-0006vt-Bi
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:02:06 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LUI5T-0006OI-3H
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:00:59 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LUI5Q-0006LZ-GD
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:00:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=60475 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUI5Q-0006LP-8h
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:00:56 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44487)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LUI5P-0008CR-Sy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:00:55 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LUI3f-0003W8-Vd; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:59:08 -0500
In-reply-to: <jwvhc3d96gq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:46:28 -0500)
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108664
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/108664>

    It still silences any other warning that might occur (e.g. in the
    future) in that same small piece of code.  So it's still blunt.

Yes, but it's rare that another warning occurs in the same small piece
of code.