From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:43:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20090202073627.GH4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233625630 30353 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2009 01:47:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Don Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 03 02:48:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LUAOj-00050S-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:48:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUANQ-0002Ct-OT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:47:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUALb-00007c-SO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LUALb-00006Q-4L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56323 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LUALa-000065-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38733) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUALa-0006OE-Ec for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUAJr-0006AE-Tr; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:43:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <20090202073627.GH4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> (message from Don Armstrong on Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:36:27 -0800) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108654 Archived-At: > There's something I don't understand: > in what way does an Emacs bug report specify a "package"? In the Package: pseudoheader; if there isn't a package specified in the pseudoheader, the instance of debbugs on emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com uses emacs as the default package. I don't know what a pseudoheader is, so I can't understand that answer. However, someone else provided the missing information: users never specify these packages. They are purely internal to the development team.