From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tassilo@member.fsf.org,
monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:52:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1LQBDu-000677-SM@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jeab9jfyan.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (message from Andreas Schwab on Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:08:32 +0100)
The main difference between SIGUSRx and SIGTERM is that SIGTERM is the
normal way to stop a process, while SIGUSRx are meant for
communication to it.
So it seems to me that Emacs should pass SIGUSRx to Lisp code and
otherwise ignore it. I believe that's what it did in the past. At
some point it pushed an event which could run a command later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-23 1:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-21 8:06 Functions in kill-emacs-hook aren't run if emacs gets killed with SIGTERM Tassilo Horn
2009-01-21 18:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-21 19:49 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-01-21 20:35 ` Chong Yidong
2009-01-22 9:03 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-01-21 20:36 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-01-22 4:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-22 9:00 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-01-22 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-23 2:15 ` mail
2009-01-23 12:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-22 10:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-01-22 18:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-23 1:52 ` Richard M Stallman [this message]
2009-01-22 14:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-01-22 18:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-22 21:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-01-23 15:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-23 15:58 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-01-23 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-23 19:56 ` David De La Harpe Golden
2009-01-23 22:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-23 23:00 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-01-23 23:13 ` Lennart Borgman
2009-01-24 9:04 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-01-24 9:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-24 12:34 ` Miles Bader
2009-01-24 10:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-23 20:33 ` Dan Nicolaescu
2009-01-23 22:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-24 4:40 ` Jason Rumney
2009-01-24 6:11 ` Miles Bader
2009-01-23 1:52 ` Richard M Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-23 19:01 grischka
2009-01-23 22:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-24 14:16 ` grischka
2009-01-24 16:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-24 17:56 ` grischka
2009-01-24 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-24 19:11 ` grischka
2009-01-24 20:08 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-01-24 20:28 ` grischka
2009-01-24 20:32 Stefan Monnier
2009-02-02 20:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-02 20:52 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-02-02 21:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-02-03 10:43 ` Tassilo Horn
2009-02-05 3:34 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-01-24 20:39 Stefan Monnier
2009-02-03 17:28 grischka
2009-02-05 3:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-02-05 13:31 ` grischka
2009-02-05 19:40 ` Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1LQBDu-000677-SM@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=tassilo@member.fsf.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).