From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard M Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Moving to bzr?
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:30:50 -0500
Message-ID: <E1LKB58-0007p3-AR@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <681309.45588.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231245143 32198 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2009 12:32:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 12:32:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: pandyacus@sbcglobal.net
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 13:33:34 2009
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1LKB7d-00031Y-IX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:33:25 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58328 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LKB6O-0006MV-05
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:08 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LKB6J-0006J8-HU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:03 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1LKB6I-0006Io-3w
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:02 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58523 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LKB6H-0006Il-Ua
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:01 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:46754)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1LKB6H-0002a6-Js
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:32:01 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1LKB58-0007p3-AR; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:30:50 -0500
In-reply-to: <681309.45588.qm@web83202.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (message from
	Chetan Pandya on Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:37:01 -0800 (PST))
X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6,
	seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107634
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/107634>

    Since this discussion still seems to be ongoing, do I take it to mean that there is some flexibility on this issue?

There is a little: if bzr is not working fast enough, we will ask the
maintainers to improve it, and wait for them to do so before we adopt
it.  But we are not going to switch to some other version control system.