From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: bug#1726: 23.0.60; end-of-sentence and non-breaking space Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:01:02 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231200160 16289 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2009 00:02:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, 1726@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa , 1726@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 06 01:03:49 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJzQ6-0006Fi-H3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:03:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54878 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJzOo-0006Xs-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:02:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJzOj-0006XM-3j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:02:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJzOg-0006X7-M1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:02:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46308 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJzOg-0006X4-FI; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44162) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJzOg-0000n3-4S; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LJzNW-0007Tw-Vb; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:01:02 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Kenichi Handa on Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:11:23 +0900) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107620 gmane.emacs.bugs:23807 Archived-At: There exist several non-Chinese character sets (e.g. tibetan) containing characters that doesn't exist in Unicode, and they are decoded into the character space over #x110000 too. But, all of them can be accessed by "\U00XXXXXX". Can you please document this (and the rest of what we have discussed in this thread)?