From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.60; end-of-sentence and non-breaking space Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:37:55 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231137562 31959 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 06:39:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 1726@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 07:40:31 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJj8W-0008Dv-8h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 07:40:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58453 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJj7G-0000ye-MK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJj6L-0000Xt-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:38:13 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJj6K-0000XI-35 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:38:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41022 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJj6J-0000XE-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:38:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:54743) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJj6E-0007l8-RA; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:38:07 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n056bumu020188; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:37:56 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n056bume006457; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:37:56 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id n056bt77024057; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:37:55 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LJj63-0001fC-5N; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:37:55 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sat, 03 Jan 2009 18:44:30 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107597 Archived-At: In article , Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Richard M Stallman > > Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:21:58 -0500 > > Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 1726@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > > > IIUC if you want the character with code #xa0, then using \u00a0 would > > seem like the most unambiguous option (I notice that "\ua0" gives > > a weird error "Non-hex digit used for Unicode escape"). > > > > I expected \xa0 to give me that character. It still seems strange > > that it would do anything else. > We need some way of inserting raw 8-bit bytes, because otherwise code > that encodes and decodes text in Lisp will not work. For inserting > characters, we have the \u alternative; but I don't think there's > alternative for raw bytes except insert \xNN. I modified read_escape to treat "\xXX" as a raw-byte code but treat "\xXXX.." as a character code U+XXX... As far as I remember, this is to keep backward compatibility. And, we have the alternative for raw bytes. That is to use octal form, something like "\240". --- Kenichi Handa handa@m17n.org