From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: (featurep 'multi-tty) => t on Windows Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:52:13 -0500 Message-ID: References: <873agwxh8p.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87r64g9fa5.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229082816 2701 80.91.229.12 (12 Dec 2008 11:53:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 12 12:54:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LB6bO-00065d-EI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:54:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55407 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6aD-0007rz-24 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:53:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6Zi-0007lp-VZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:52:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6Zh-0007k1-5e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:52:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53296 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LB6Zh-0007jy-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:52:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:47089) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LB6Zg-0003QW-Q1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:52:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LB6Z3-00069d-Vx; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 06:52:14 -0500 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106836 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:35:33 +0100 > From: "Juanma Barranquero" > Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 00:17, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > Can't we test something, instead of a preprocessor define that states > > an OS? I'd rather not proliferate abuse of preprocessor for this. > > I'd rather not, too. That's why I haven't committed anything. Well, boundp and fboundp can be called from C as well, so if you can find something that we could test for bound-ness, that will do the trick. (I'm traveling and don't have easy access to sources nor enough time to look myself, sorry.)