From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Undo-limit default Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:48:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <873ah0n4xc.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <493BC963.3000907@gmx.at> <493BCDB2.1010001@gmx.at> <87vdtwf43c.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87bpvoghop.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1228736982 8300 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2008 11:49:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 11:49:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 08 12:50:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1L9edS-000208-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 12:50:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53707 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9ecH-00063K-PG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:49:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9ecC-00063F-HU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1L9ecB-000633-6P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42877 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1L9ecB-000630-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:49:27 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:44187) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1L9ecA-0002wf-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:49:26 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1L9ebc-0004QE-Jq; Mon, 08 Dec 2008 06:48:52 -0500 In-reply-to: <87bpvoghop.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (message from Chong Yidong on Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:53:42 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:106672 Archived-At: > Could you check whether stripping out the font-lock information has any > bad effects? The following untested patch should implement this > behavior BTW, I don't think such a change should go into Emacs 23.1; it might be worth doing after the release. That depends on how much it affects performance. I have noticed lots of garbage collection during font lock processing. Is this the reason why? Does fixing this lead to a big speedup?