From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Richard M. Stallman" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus should accept UTF8 even if UTF-8 is standard Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:02:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87wsg2tvcn.fsf@xemacs.org> <20081021062510.GB22593@tomas> <87prlutizh.fsf@xemacs.org> <87k5c2tan9.fsf@xemacs.org> <87fxmptl1y.fsf@xemacs.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1224709621 23302 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2008 21:07:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:07:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, ding@gnus.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, tomas@tuxteam.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, miles@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16122@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Oct 22 23:08:02 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kskvx-0006E5-So for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:08:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ksktl-0007KR-NL; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:05:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Ksktk-0007KC-GI for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:05:44 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ksktg-0005Oo-Jj for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 16:05:44 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ksktn-0006DU-00 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:05:47 +0200 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Kskr2-0004lr-9L; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:02:56 -0400 In-reply-to: <87fxmptl1y.fsf@xemacs.org> (stephen@xemacs.org) X-Spam-Score: -5.6 (-----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:67671 gmane.emacs.devel:104862 Archived-At: Well, no, I think it is not. AFAIK only one of "iso-8859-1" and "iso8859-1" is registered, but Emacs uses the former exclusively, and X11 only the latter (in XLFDs). I think it would be better if Emacs accepted either form, if specified.