From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Args out of range with new auto-composition implementation Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:07:53 +0900 Message-ID: References: <863ak6wxjq.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1222236490 6025 80.91.229.12 (24 Sep 2008 06:08:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 06:08:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 24 08:09:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KiNYf-0003F7-Nf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 08:09:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56717 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiNXd-0003jt-Iu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:08:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiNXZ-0003jo-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:07:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KiNXZ-0003jc-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:07:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=53229 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KiNXZ-0003jZ-3q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:07:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:47905) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KiNXY-0004Rs-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 02:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m8O67sDM015581; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:07:54 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m8O67sUF009038; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:07:54 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m8O67rZw022115; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:07:53 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KiNXV-0004xE-IC; Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:07:53 +0900 In-reply-to: <863ak6wxjq.fsf@lifelogs.com> (message from Ted Zlatanov on Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:46:01 -0500) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104088 Archived-At: In article <863ak6wxjq.fsf@lifelogs.com>, Ted Zlatanov writes: > On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:07:18 +0900 Kenichi Handa wrote: KH> In article , "Juanma Barranquero" writes: >>> An error I'm getting since the auto-composition changes of a few days ago: >>> ;;; testbug.el ;;; >>> (column-number-mode 1) >>> (defun testbug () >>> (interactive) >>> (split-window) >>> (other-window 1) >>> (pop-to-buffer (get-buffer-create "testbug"))) >>> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;; >>> emacs -Q -l testbug.el >>> C-h H >>> M-: (goto-char 276) ;; or move the cursor to any auto-composed char >>> M-x testbug >>>>> "Args out of range: 274, 274" KH> I can't reproduce that bug with the latest code. Can you? > I noticed something very similar in CVS Gnus with CVS Emacs from > yesterday. See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/67353 > For now I've wrapped the problem with a condition-case in Gnus... > Definitely not the right solution, but I can enter groups now :) Do you still see the same problem with the latest code when you disable that wrapping? --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp