From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: composition bug Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:24:33 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87hc8rn3ws.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87r67u3k52.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87iqt53mk7.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87zlmcxsq1.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1221546297 25476 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2008 06:24:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 06:24:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Romain Francoise Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 08:25:54 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KfU0X-0001pw-A5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 08:25:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43209 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KfTzW-0004a9-Dq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KfTzR-0004Zj-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KfTzQ-0004Z8-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:24:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45456 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KfTzQ-0004Yx-Ng for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:34287) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KfTzQ-0002fw-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:24:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KfTzO-0003e1-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:24:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m8G6OYOs005954; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:24:34 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m8G6OYeI025494; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:24:34 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m8G6OXle019900; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:24:33 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KfTzF-0004xc-Pl; Tue, 16 Sep 2008 15:24:33 +0900 In-reply-to: <87zlmcxsq1.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> (message from Romain Francoise on Sat, 13 Sep 2008 12:09:26 +0200) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103898 Archived-At: In article <87zlmcxsq1.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com>, Romain Francoise writes: > I just noticed something about this bug: if I save all the text from > the HELLO buffer and insert it into another, it doesn't happen > anymore. In the new buffer, the cursor moves normally. > (E.g. do C-h h C-x h M-w C-x b foo RET C-y.) > However, as soon as I save this new buffer to a file the bug appears > again and point moves to random positions in the buffer with C-n/C-f. > I tried various coding systems for saving the file, but it doesn't > seem to be relevant. Does the random movement appear again just by saving that new buffer, or it appears again after saving and re-reading from the new file? And, is that random movement really random; i.e. each time when you type C-n at the head of HELLO file, point moves to the different point? --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp