From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22.2.90 pretest Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:25:51 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87y72ymcig.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1219317988 28965 80.91.229.12 (21 Aug 2008 11:26:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 11:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 21 13:27:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KW8Jv-0007az-6n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:27:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45664 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KW8Ix-0002Ot-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:26:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KW8Is-0002Oj-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:26:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KW8In-0002OG-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:26:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35021 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KW8In-0002O9-J6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:26:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:45295) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KW8If-0004VZ-Ti; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 07:25:58 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m7LBPqZg028474; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:25:52 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m7LBPqh6004791; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:25:52 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m7LBPpQB003122; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:25:51 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KW8IZ-0008CA-PO; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:25:51 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Thu, 21 Aug 2008 15:16:00 +0900) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102768 Archived-At: In article , YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu writes: > > Is nm the only variable in danger? If so, how about if we simply > > copy it on all platforms? > I think it is one possible solution if properly commented. Another is to do something like this (excerpted from send_process ()). int offset = 0; [...] /* Running filters might relocate buffers or strings. Arrange to relocate BUF. */ if (BUFFERP (object)) offset = BUF_PTR_BYTE_POS (XBUFFER (object), buf); else if (STRINGP (object)) offset = buf - SDATA (object); #ifdef EMACS_HAS_USECS wait_reading_process_output (0, 20000, 0, 0, Qnil, NULL, 0); #else wait_reading_process_output (1, 0, 0, 0, Qnil, NULL, 0); #endif if (BUFFERP (object)) buf = BUF_BYTE_ADDRESS (XBUFFER (object), offset); else if (STRINGP (object)) buf = offset + SDATA (object); --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp