Re: Misc problems with INSTALL file

[Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>]

In article <877iaejafg.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm>, storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes:

> I noticed the following stuff in INSTALL which should be fixed:

> > To take proper advantage of Emacs 21's mule-unicode charsets, you need
> > a suitable font.  For `Unicode' (ISO 10646) fonts for X, see

> Emacs 21 should be just Emacs.

> Do we still speak of "mule-unicode" ?

I think no.  How about the change something like this?

*** INSTALL.~1.135.~	2008-08-01 10:56:23.000000000 +0900
--- INSTALL	2008-08-19 10:21:19.000000000 +0900
***************
*** 177,184 ****
  The Emacs distribution does not include fonts and does not install
  them.  You must do that yourself.
  
! To take proper advantage of Emacs 21's mule-unicode charsets, you need
! a suitable font.  For `Unicode' (ISO 10646) fonts for X, see
  <URL:http://czyborra.com/unifont/> (packaged in Debian),
  <URL:http://openlab.ring.gr.jp/efont/> (packaged in Debian).  (In
  recent Debian versions, there is an extensive `misc-fixed' iso10646-1
--- 177,186 ----
  The Emacs distribution does not include fonts and does not install
  them.  You must do that yourself.
  
! Emacs running on the GNU system supports both X fonts and local fonts
! (i.e. the fonts managed by the fontconfig library).
! 
! For `Unicode' (ISO 10646) X fonts, see
  <URL:http://czyborra.com/unifont/> (packaged in Debian),
  <URL:http://openlab.ring.gr.jp/efont/> (packaged in Debian).  (In
  recent Debian versions, there is an extensive `misc-fixed' iso10646-1

---
Kenichi Handa
handa@ni.aist.go.jp