From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard M Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Face initialization Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:06:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87skunbllv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87skunt8qp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87r6a6xuim.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87zlot7b0u.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <48736E43.2050602@gnu.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215558463 8745 80.91.229.12 (8 Jul 2008 23:07:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 23:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: stephen@xemacs.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Jason Rumney Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 09 01:08:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KGMHy-0005Y7-Pc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:08:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45241 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KGMH7-0001OH-Ey for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGMH3-0001NN-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KGMH2-0001N4-NA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50066 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KGMH2-0001N1-Iv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52073) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KGMH2-0002Ik-EX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KGMGc-00037t-BH; Tue, 08 Jul 2008 19:06:38 -0400 In-reply-to: <48736E43.2050602@gnu.org> (message from Jason Rumney on Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:40:19 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100467 Archived-At: Currently the -fn command line argument accepts 3 forms of font specification; GTK, Fontconfig and XLFD, so there is no reason why any other place where fonts are specified as strings could not do the same. I am glad it is feasible to handle all three. My suggestion is to make a function `set-face-font' to do that, and get rid of the `font' frame parameter.