From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Fix UK spelling in comments and ChangeLog entries? Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:50:38 +0900 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214617868 26341 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2008 01:51:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:51:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 28 03:51:53 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KCPbT-000117-C0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 03:51:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57018 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KCPad-00066Q-Eu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KCPaY-00063a-IJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KCPaX-00061O-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:50:54 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=57743 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KCPaX-00061D-EH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]:45437) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KCPaN-00084M-FO; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 21:50:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5S1odWO025838; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:50:39 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp4.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5S1od42015557; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:50:39 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp4.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m5S1ocal018848; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:50:38 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KCPaI-0002cm-OO; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:50:38 +0900 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100084 Archived-At: In article , "Juanma Barranquero" writes: > It was a lame attempt at humor; you're excused for not getting it. > remove and delete are groups of functions (remove, remove-if, > remove-if-not, ec.) with similar behavior, but the remove* ones are > non-destructive (they return a new list) while the delete* ones are > destructive. So you wanting to conflate both terms produced a > cognitive disonance :) Ah! :-) --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp