From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gathering data on how people use Emacs Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080324161300.191df4b6@reforged> <87bq531u1s.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87prtixtvx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1206570436 5607 80.91.229.12 (26 Mar 2008 22:27:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:27:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 26 23:27:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jee5h-0006LL-0E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:27:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jee55-0001if-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:26:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jee3r-0000yb-JG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jee3q-0000xu-2b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jee3p-0000xo-QX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jee3p-0004YT-Kd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:33 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jee3l-0007m2-RR; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:25:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <87prtixtvx.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (message from Bastien on Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:32:02 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:93568 Archived-At: > Thus, trying to use better technology to count votes is missing > the point of the poll. Yes. The whole point of using the form I proposed is precisely to get detailed comments and scenarii, not raw yes/no. I am sorry I misunderstood this point.