From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general Subject: Re: Emacs repository benchmark: bzr and git Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:47 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080318154316.GA6242@mithlond.arda.local> <47DFE4EA.5000600@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205895249 3123 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2008 02:54:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, tlikonen@iki.fi, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: dhruva Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 19 03:54:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JboRm-0004Tn-1v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:54:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JboRC-0000pm-6H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JboR3-0000mr-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JboR2-0000mT-Ko for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JboR2-0000mL-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:48 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JboR2-0000BQ-2U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JboR1-0004vm-G5; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:47 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from dhruva on Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:35:30 +0530) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92956 gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38953 Archived-At: To the emacs maintainers and decision makers: What more information is required to convince bzr is not the right tool at the present moment? This decision is not a decision for the present moment. It is a long term decision. So it would be better to wait a few months while Bzr developers improve it, than to make some other "temporary" decision that would probably be hard to reverse.