From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Usability suggestion : completion for M-: Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:10 -0400 Message-ID: References: <003001c886f5$366f4330$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <874pb7ikt7.fsf@jurta.org> <000501c8873d$4ff68550$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <000701c88785$bd26dce0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87d4puxx2b.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205895210 3050 80.91.229.12 (19 Mar 2008 02:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 02:53:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bzg@altern.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "paul r" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 19 03:53:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JboR9-0004K7-3N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 03:53:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JboQZ-0000Ta-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JboQW-0000TU-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JboQT-0000TG-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JboQT-0000TD-J3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JboQT-0008TC-9u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:13 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JboQQ-0004q5-AA; Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:53:10 -0400 In-reply-to: (paul.r.ml@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92955 Archived-At: How necessary is it today to have *by default* C-i bound to TAB (and C-m bound to RET). I thin both indentation and completion are important enough to be on TAB, not C-i. In any case, we should not change such a thing without polling the users.