From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: SYNC_INPUT and 23.1. Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <47CE52B1.3050600@swipnet.se> <47D63FEE.1040807@swipnet.se> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205344582 27817 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 17:56:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 18:56:49 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZVBZ-0005iy-Ew for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:56:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZVB0-0004UH-Sp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:55:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZV76-00081n-EQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZV72-0007xg-7y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZV72-0007xP-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:36 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZV71-0004Mb-Rg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZV71-00079m-5j; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:51:35 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu on Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:47:07 +0900) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92307 Archived-At: Even with SYNC_INPUT, atimer functions (except poll_for_input) may still call malloc in the signal handler context. So emacs_blocked_malloc etc. were actually meaningful even in SYNC_INPUT environments. Why is that? Can it be eliminated?