From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CUA mode's C-RET binding Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:12:05 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87pru8enjx.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <871w6l3u8f.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <871w6j7cga.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <003001c8823a$d7cd5010$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <87lk4r5v2o.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <003101c88242$18736fd0$0600a8c0@us.oracle.com> <7dbe73ed0803100313g46d079dag91e1b8af1f750ee8@mail.gmail.com> <47D53BF1.70401@gmail.com> <47D54B62.9010404@gmail.com> <87k5kai2y8.fsf@jurta.org> <87wso9c7dn.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205335021 21068 80.91.229.12 (12 Mar 2008 15:17:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 15:17:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Manoj Srivastava Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 16:17:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZShL-0004C5-A5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:16:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZSgl-0000t1-Bx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:16:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZScs-0007rB-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZScr-0007qO-98 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:12:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZScr-0007qH-3R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:12:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZScq-0003PK-3F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:12:16 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JZScf-0000in-UV; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:12:06 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wso9c7dn.fsf@anzu.internal.golden-gryphon.com> (message from Manoj Srivastava on Tue, 11 Mar 2008 15:50:44 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92295 Archived-At: A more plausible scenario is if I have recently run "rm -rf .", in a directory where that was appropriate. Now I have cd'd to a different directory (perhaps even my home directory), where executing that command could do damage. Yes, it could. But what can we do about that rare case without causing lots and lots of hassles in more common cases?