From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAINTAINERS file Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:53:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <18375.18663.981150.252393@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87zlte3848.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <877igipc17.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> <87tzjmnsiz.fsf@jbms.ath.cx> <85hcfi28n2.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205096221 2247 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2008 20:57:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 20:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, jeremy@jeremyms.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 09 21:57:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYSaC-0007AH-V7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:57:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYSZf-0005Fv-0V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:56:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYSWg-0002LE-IC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYSWd-0002JT-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYSWd-0002JP-FY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYSWd-00043v-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:53:43 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYSWc-00019d-IH; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 16:53:42 -0400 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91916 Archived-At: > Emacs is not particularly known for only going well-trodden paths. In > more than one way it has been a front-runner for Free Software and the > policies I know. But Richard was not saying that we should use Bazaar with Emacs because Emacs is one of GNU flagship projects, I didn't say that, but now that people mention it, it is another good reason. but that all GNU projects *should use* Bazaar. They should do so when it makes sense. I won't insist that every GNU package use a VCS, or that every GNU package use a dVCS. But if it uses a dVCS, it may as well be Bazaar.