From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: position on changing defaults? Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:39:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87hcfkdhqk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pru8enjx.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87wsod2f2i.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87iqzw3hyd.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205081000 26720 80.91.229.12 (9 Mar 2008 16:43:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 16:43:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 09 17:43:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JYOck-0002IN-MZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 17:43:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYOcC-000466-MB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:43:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYOZA-0002Uk-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JYOZ6-0002Qz-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JYOZ6-0002QR-Mr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JYOZ6-0003bA-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JYOZ5-0006qA-6C; Sun, 09 Mar 2008 12:39:59 -0400 In-reply-to: <87iqzw3hyd.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> (storm@cua.dk) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91886 Archived-At: Well, I've never had a use for them in practice - and one of the features of CUA rectangles is that the cursor is INSIDE one of the rectangle corners -- namely the corner which you expand by moving the cursor. Such an inconsistency between two ways of marking a rectangle seems really bad. At present, since one of them is "just an emulation", perhaps the inconsistency is not important. But if both of them were part of recommended Emacs interfaces, the inconsistency would be glaring.