From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: position on changing defaults? Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:37:16 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200803050637.m256bXL3008361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <8563w1xzop.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204861150 26675 80.91.229.12 (7 Mar 2008 03:39:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 03:39:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 07 04:39:37 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JXTQn-0003eE-FI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 04:39:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXTQF-0003Jm-Ei for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXTOY-0002Vk-E2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:37:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JXTOX-0002VC-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:37:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JXTOW-0002V7-Ur for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:37:16 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JXTOW-0000PX-LC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:37:16 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JXTOW-0001Fq-A8; Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:37:16 -0500 In-reply-to: <8563w1xzop.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 05 Mar 2008 10:55:34 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91588 Archived-At: It would not have been an improvement if global-font-lock-mode would have been made the default before this had been tackled satisfactorily. Having the font-lock proponents actually work hard on making the code acceptable to those who don't crave font-lock-mode that much but need tolerable performance for large cases: this has been very important and contributed to the quality of Emacs code. Well said.