From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: carriage-return no longer works quite right in shell-mode Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:00:28 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87wsoow3zx.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204682468 1006 80.91.229.12 (5 Mar 2008 02:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 02:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, romain@orebokech.com, rms@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 05 03:01:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWiwn-0005qJ-WE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 03:01:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWiwG-0006gf-M8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:01:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWiwA-0006cp-By for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWiw6-0006YY-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWiw5-0006Y7-Hj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:49 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWiw5-0005f3-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JWiw4-0003jU-QN for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWiw0-0005e8-Lg for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1s.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.134]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWivz-0005ck-I3; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 21:00:44 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.115]) by mx1s.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m2520XZr020022; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:00:33 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp3.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m2520WKR004939; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:00:32 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp3.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m2520VCV017718; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 11:00:31 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JWivk-0005Y6-Br; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:00:28 +0900 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Tue, 04 Mar 2008 10:46:31 -0500) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91345 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21410 Archived-At: In article , Stefan Monnier writes: > > I propose the following change to comint.el. Although I > > think the new code improve the handling of CR, I have not > > yet committed it because comint-output-filter (the caller of > > comint-carriage-motion) does complicated marker and overlay > > adjustment, and I'm not that confident that the new code > > doesn't make the adjustment breaks. Could someone who is > > familiar with comint-output-filter check it? > Thanks for looking into it. > I think you may as well commit it. Ok, done. --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp