From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: carriage-return no longer works quite right in shell-mode Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:44:56 +0900 Message-ID: References: <87wsoow3zx.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <87hcfrwzyw.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204631126 30648 80.91.229.12 (4 Mar 2008 11:45:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2008 11:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Romain Francoise Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 04 12:45:52 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JWVae-0006dV-04 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 12:45:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWVa6-00018s-TR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWVa2-00018H-Ei for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JWVa1-00017t-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JWVa0-00017o-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWVa0-0003pO-JH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JWVa0-0003Ge-6n for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWVZx-0003oL-9Z for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.aist.go.jp ([150.29.246.133]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JWVZt-0003mq-55; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 06:45:01 -0500 Original-Received: from rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp (rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp [150.29.254.123]) by mx1.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m24BiveL007353; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:44:57 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from smtp2.aist.go.jp by rqsmtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m24BivAt004514; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:44:57 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: by smtp2.aist.go.jp with ESMTP id m24Biukd020311; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 20:44:56 +0900 (JST) env-from (handa@m17n.org) Original-Received: from handa by etlken.m17n.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1JWVZo-0003Oe-MP; Tue, 04 Mar 2008 20:44:56 +0900 In-reply-to: <87hcfrwzyw.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> (message from Romain Francoise on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:21:11 +0100) User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 8 (1) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:91277 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21404 Archived-At: In article <87hcfrwzyw.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com>, Romain Francoise writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: > > Could someone figure out why default-process-coding-system > > specifies eol-format now? > Could it be a side effect of this change? (The ChangeLog entry is > from the trunk, the change itself is from the Unicode branch.) > 2008-02-01 Kenichi Handa > * coding.c (coding_inherit_eol_type): If PARENT is nil, inherit from > system_eol_type. > (syms_of_coding): Initialize system_eol_type. > * process.c (Fset_process_coding_system): Inherit system's eol > format if necessary. But, Fset_process_coding_system makes only the coding system for ENCODING inheirt the system EOL type. --- Kenichi Handa handa@ni.aist.go.jp