From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: bruce.el
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:14 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JUIuY-0003E0-51@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <7q4pc0bmba.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1JT03S-00058e-TR@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<bwve4eou9s.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1JTb1K-0007SM-Mb@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<877igrlljm.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1204105777 15466 80.91.229.12 (27 Feb 2008 09:49:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:49:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Hansen <david.hansen@gmx.net>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 27 10:50:03 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JUIvC-00080F-19
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:49:54 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JUIug-0003dv-0S
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:22 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JUIuZ-0003bV-L1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:15 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JUIuY-0003bC-Pr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:15 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUIuY-0003b9-M1
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:14 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JUIuY-00065t-DU
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:14 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JUIuY-0003E0-51; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 04:49:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <877igrlljm.fsf@localhorst.mine.nu> (message from David Hansen on
	Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:39:09 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:90584
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/90584>

    Should "TWAT" (The War Against Terrorism) go into spook.lines or
    bruce.lines?  This thing turned out to be pretty indecent, so I vote for
    bruce.lines.

I doubt that surveillance agencies are officially looking for TWAT.
The individual agents perhaps, but not as part of their job.