From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CUA-mode features and documenation Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <000d01c86c82$700dccc0$7051908d@us.oracle.com> <200802121430.m1CEUc6k013361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <002601c86d8a$a0454db0$405a908d@us.oracle.com> <87tzkdnkee.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <87ir0sonaa.fsf_-_@kfs-lx.rd.rdm> <200802131623.m1DGNrls003614@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87odakwl2r.fsf@jurta.org> <87myq4saw1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <878x1ov227.fsf@jurta.org> <878x1os6mt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <47B39231.8010108@gmail.com> <200802151711.m1FHB3Y3008798@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203254665 15336 80.91.229.12 (17 Feb 2008 13:24:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, miles@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 17 14:24:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQjVe-0006hj-Vv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:24:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQjVA-0008FX-Il for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:24:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQjTJ-00079V-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:21 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQjTI-00078h-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQjTH-00078c-TP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:19 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQjTH-00015g-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:19 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQjTH-0002pT-51; Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:22:19 -0500 In-reply-to: <200802151711.m1FHB3Y3008798@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:11:03 -0800) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89331 Archived-At: BTW, before the pretest for 22.1 you were trying transient-mark-mode in order to enable it by default. What was the result of that experiment? I could not stand Transient Mark mode by itself. However, I now use it with `mark-even-if-inactive' = t, and I think that is fine.