From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bzr on Savannah Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87zlu3r0rn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203033981 13173 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2008 00:06:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Bastien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 01:06:44 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JPo6A-0004be-Iq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 01:06:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo5g-0008Lo-Pz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:06:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo34-0007KA-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:26 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo32-0007JH-NL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPo32-0007JB-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPo31-0007H8-Rr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:23 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JPo2z-0002Cs-0s; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:03:21 -0500 In-reply-to: <87zlu3r0rn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (message from Bastien on Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:55:08 +0000) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89117 Archived-At: Bzr is now a GNU package, though it has not been updated to reflect that. It is most unlikely that git or Mercurial will be GNU packages. Thus, unless Bzr is unsuitable, we should use Bzr. We've seen enough to know that each has its advantages but all are workable. So we should use Bzr. And if there are aspects of it which prove inconvenient, we can ask the Maintainer of Bzr to improve them.