From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: CUA-mode features and documenation
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:10:55 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JPiXv-0006Gs-DH@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1GHpJI-0002C4-KS@fencepost.gnu.org>	<EIENLHALHGIMHGDOLMIMEEBNDDAA.drew.adams@oracle.com>	<000d01c86c82$700dccc0$7051908d@us.oracle.com>	<E1JOfux-00062N-1O@fencepost.gnu.org>	<200802121430.m1CEUc6k013361@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu>	<002601c86d8a$a0454db0$405a908d@us.oracle.com>	<E1JOzBk-0006aG-Cm@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87tzkdnkee.fsf@kfs-lx.rd.rdm>	<jwvr6fgvp6b.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>	<87ir0sonaa.fsf_-_@kfs-lx.rd.rdm>	<200802131623.m1DGNrls003614@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu>	<87odakwl2r.fsf@jurta.org>
	<87myq4saw1.fsf@catnip.gol.com>	<878x1ov227.fsf@jurta.org>
	<878x1os6mt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <47B39231.8010108@gmail.com>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203012671 3741 80.91.229.12 (14 Feb 2008 18:11:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:11:11 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: juri@jurta.org, dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk,
	miles@gnu.org
To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <lennart.borgman@gmail.com>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 14 19:11:34 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JPiYV-00074K-Ut
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:11:32 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JPiY2-0001ia-1e
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:11:02 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JPiXy-0001iD-Tv
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:10:58 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JPiXx-0001hB-6A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:10:58 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPiXx-0001h5-1j
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:10:57 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JPiXx-0000kC-0O
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:10:57 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JPiXv-0006Gs-DH; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:10:55 -0500
In-reply-to: <47B39231.8010108@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89088
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/89088>

    Is it not reasonable to assume that most new users expects and wants the 
    behaviour that cua-selection-mode gives?

That is not the only relevant factor.

What _exactly_ is this behavior?  I do not use CUA mode.