From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: emacsclient bug
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:27 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JNKf5-0000XS-Jg@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <hbfxwx9uw4.wl%len@netvalue.net.nz>
	<jwvbq7kihnn.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<hbd4s09vzw.wl%len@netvalue.net.nz>
	<jwvabn4gurf.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<hbbq7k9t0u.wl%len@netvalue.net.nz>
	<jwvejcc44el.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<hb7ii4yxdl.wl%len@netvalue.net.nz>
	<jwvbq7gne9g.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<hby7ajyik5.wl%len@netvalue.net.nz>
	<jwvbq7f2n8z.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1JHHL9-0003gK-Hm@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<jwvprvodzd0.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<ur9odb89g39.fsf@totally-fudged-out-message-id>
	<200801271541.m0RFfGE6016267@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu>
	<m2k5lpapbr.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
	<jwvbq6udmqy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<200802061740.m16HeX90025576@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu>
	<E1JMusO-0003WM-RX@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m27ihh9lzc.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202444387 26735 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2008 04:19:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 04:19:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, lenbok@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Sascha Wilde <wilde@sha-bang.de>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 08 05:20:08 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JNKid-00017b-HQ
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:20:07 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JNKiA-0006K1-ON
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:19:38 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JNKf8-0003v9-CO
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:30 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JNKf6-0003tb-TV
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:29 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JNKf6-0003tQ-Cx
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:28 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JNKf6-0005PL-Az
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:28 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JNKf5-0000XS-Jg; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:16:27 -0500
In-reply-to: <m27ihh9lzc.fsf@kenny.sha-bang.de> (message from Sascha Wilde on
	Thu, 07 Feb 2008 10:03:51 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88495
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/88495>

    No objections here, but I thought that `-c' would explicitly state "open a
    new X11 frame (if available)" in contrast to `-t' which is documented as
    "Open a new Emacs frame on the current terminal".

That would also be a consistent definition.

I have no strong preference between your proposed definition
and the definition that the other message cited as the official one.