From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient bug Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200801271541.m0RFfGE6016267@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200802061740.m16HeX90025576@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202345167 19421 80.91.229.12 (7 Feb 2008 00:46:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, lenbok@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 07 01:46:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMuuD-0001nW-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:46:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMutk-0001wo-LV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:45:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMusU-0000a4-Mj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:34 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JMusQ-0000Xm-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMusP-0000Xg-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:29 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JMusP-0005bl-Hb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:29 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JMusO-0003WM-RX; Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:44:28 -0500 In-reply-to: <200802061740.m16HeX90025576@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:40:33 -0800) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88375 Archived-At: > Of course, if your Emacs server has both X11 and tty frames, then "-c" > will arbitrarily open either a tty frame or an X11 frame depending on > which frame happens to be selected when the emacsclient connects to it. Given that, taking into account the current frame when emacsclient connects does not seem like a good idea. I disagree. I think that what -c does is the right default. It says "make a new frame". Making it on the same terminal is clearly the best default. You can specify additional options to say where the new frame should go.