From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: choice for the new emacs icon
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:48 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JMSUO-0002OY-HD@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <200802050135.m151ZGDH005052@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu>
	<87y79zsrdw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86ir13ojbm.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1202235996 25672 80.91.229.12 (5 Feb 2008 18:26:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:26:36 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bzg@altern.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 05 19:26:57 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JMSVN-0001bt-FX
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:26:49 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JMSUv-000815-5B
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:26:21 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JMSUT-0007ej-D3
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:53 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JMSUR-0007cC-JM
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:52 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JMSUR-0007bx-CB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:51 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JMSUR-0001JX-6y
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:51 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JMSUO-0002OY-HD; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 13:25:48 -0500
In-reply-to: <86ir13ojbm.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on
	Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:15:25 +0100)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:88292
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/88292>

    Our current icons lean forward (making the "M" and the horns more
    conspicuous) and still "go up".  So I don't think that we should be made
    to pick between two new icon variants which are both visually worse in
    that respect.

I'm sure we could add a pen to the current icon if that is what people
prefer.