From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabbed buffers Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:39 -0500 Message-ID: References: <18330.23354.579245.68671@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87ejc5sf4l.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <18330.29609.396872.678539@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87wspxqwjv.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <18338.38672.698049.105641@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201890415 2565 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2008 18:26:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: nickrob@snap.net.nz, eliz@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: raman@users.sf.net Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 19:27:16 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JL0bb-00084t-OZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 19:27:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JL0bA-0007or-1A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JL0b5-0007md-BQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:43 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JL0b3-0007jg-MX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JL0b3-0007jS-Da for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:41 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JL0b3-0004po-23 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:41 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JL0b1-0001eG-UT; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 13:26:39 -0500 In-reply-to: <18338.38672.698049.105641@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (raman@users.sf.net) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87944 Archived-At: Doing this on Linux would also have the nice side-effect of allowing tty users to place each frameset on a different virtual console, something which would make it easier to logically separate out frames. I don't follow that.