From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tabbed buffers Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <18330.23354.579245.68671@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87ejc5sf4l.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <18330.29609.396872.678539@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87wspxqwjv.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201504787 21860 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2008 07:19:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 28 08:20:07 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JJOHn-0000BV-7U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 08:20:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOHM-0005gj-6g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:19:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOFi-0004ok-4S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOFg-0004o9-KT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JJOFg-0004o1-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JJOFg-0002jb-Ai for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JJOFf-0001JD-TK; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 02:17:55 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:59:10 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87688 Archived-At: All I was pointing out was that if we introduce frame-level tabs, then it might make sense to treat the current "multiple-frames on a single tty" as tabs rather than as frames. That seems like an unnecessary complication with no benefit.