From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: State of VC? Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20080122164306.3B33C83045C@snark.thyrsus.com> <200801222207.m0MM7rlR014153@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200801240707.m0O77KcX018757@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87bq7bd2gi.fsf@ambire.localdomain> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201301261 27557 80.91.229.12 (25 Jan 2008 22:47:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:47:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@gnuvola.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 25 23:48:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JIXL0-0008St-UL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:47:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIXKa-0008Ni-HX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIXKV-0008LI-FE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JIXKT-0008JD-6x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JIXKT-0008Iy-3n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:21 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JIXKS-0003iV-S3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JIXKR-0006G4-Tv; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:47:20 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:57:12 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87521 Archived-At: The third argument to get-buffer-window really should not be optional, to force people to think a bit more about the multi-frame case, which is all too often ignored. That is a good point, but I think such a change would break lots of old code, and thus is a bad idea.