From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacsclient bug Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:30:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1201001533 21264 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2008 11:32:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: lenbok@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 22 12:32:32 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHHMb-0001NN-SW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:32:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHHMB-0001Pv-RA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:31:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHHLD-0000NB-1a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:30:55 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JHHLB-0000Ka-C0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:30:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHHLA-0000KM-VP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JHHLA-0006V5-F5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:30:52 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JHHL9-0003gK-Hm; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:30:51 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:52:53 -0500) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87289 Archived-At: That fact that the Emacs server does not yet have an X11 connection open is not taken into account to decide what to: if the client does not explicitly ask for a tty, then the default is to use an X11 frame. That might not be the right thing to do. It seems to me that the most convenient behavior for emacsclient is to use (by default) the tty or display that Emacs is already using. It would do that unless you specify -display or -nw or -t. Doesn't that seem right to you?