From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [eric@openbsd.org: c-mode syntactic analysis regression in
	emacs-22.1]
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:18 -0500
Message-ID: <E1JFrGc-0007X9-5e@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <E1Iw8Op-0000Xg-9b@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<14k5mm3frq.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20080114194249.GA4574@muc.de>
	<lutzlgdt0w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200662980 20477 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2008 13:29:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:29:40 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 18 14:29:58 2008
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1JFrID-0008EL-J2
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:29:58 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JFrHj-0004RP-Oy
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:29:27 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JFrGh-0003sW-Jm
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:23 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1JFrGf-0003qj-6a
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:22 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFrGe-0003qY-Uk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:20 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1JFrGe-0003HJ-Mi
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:21 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1JFrGc-0007X9-5e; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:28:18 -0500
In-reply-to: <lutzlgdt0w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:57:51 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87051
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/87051>

    It's impossible to say. It seems to depend on FOR-RELEASE becoming
    empty of bugs before someone happens to report a new bug of any kind.

Very few bugs have been added in the past couple of months.
Unfortunately people have not fixed many either.  Would people
please turn their attention to fixing the Emacs 22 bugs?

Also, who would like to take charge of Emacs 22 pretesting?