From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:53 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <20071231130712.GB8641@thyrsus.com> <87y7b96az8.fsf@member.fsf.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199354520 2298 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2008 10:02:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Tassilo Horn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 03 11:02:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JAMu1-0002R9-7L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 11:02:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMtf-0004Ph-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 05:01:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMj1-00060c-UY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMj0-0005zh-OK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JAMj0-0005zW-A0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAMj0-0000vB-04; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:54 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAMiz-0000dP-Kt; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:50:53 -0500 In-reply-to: <87y7b96az8.fsf@member.fsf.org> (message from Tassilo Horn on Tue, 01 Jan 2008 12:28:43 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85980 Archived-At: There would be no need to have write access at all. I can alway commit to my repository (even when I'm offline, a fact that should be a big plus for Richard) and synching happens whenever something important has be done and some core dev reviewed it. I am having trouble understanding what it _means_ to say that you can do a "commit" into your own repository. That must be something very different from a "commit" in CVS terms. Perhaps it is so different that the two are not comparable at all.