From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What a modern collaboration toolkit looks like Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:51 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20071230122217.3CA84830B9A@snark.thyrsus.com> <20071230172259.GB6572@thyrsus.com> <18296.5089.576420.693451@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <47781AED.1010108@gmail.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199055757 18525 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2007 23:02:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, esr@snark.thyrsus.com, nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 31 00:02:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J97BD-0003ih-16 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Dec 2007 00:02:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J97Ar-00063u-LH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J977N-000347-S9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J977M-00032J-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J977M-000329-3D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:52 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J977L-0007VE-Rw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:51 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J977L-0003zq-AT; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 17:58:51 -0500 In-reply-to: <47781AED.1010108@gmail.com> (lennart.borgman@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85714 Archived-At: What was the problem with choosing a bug tracking system? Aren't there any systems where you can commit changes and do other things with bug track records just as you do for source code? I would not be averse to using a bug-tracking system if I can operate it by mail. However, I don't think that recording the known bugs differently will automatically convince people to work on fixing them. That's the bottleneck. The same 4 or 5 bugs have been recorded in the Emacs 22 FOR-RELEASE file for over a month. Would people please work on fixing them?