From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "CHANGED outside Customize" in frames customization group Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:15 -0500 Message-ID: References: <47768503.9010108@gmx.at> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1198978613 4354 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2007 01:36:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 01:36:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 30 02:37:07 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J8n6w-0000If-TK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Dec 2007 02:37:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J8n6b-0004x7-Iz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J8n69-0004ig-P6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:17 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J8n68-0004h8-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J8n67-0004gw-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J8n67-0003nW-Oj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:15 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J8n67-0003iB-42; Sat, 29 Dec 2007 20:36:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <47768503.9010108@gmx.at> (message from martin rudalics on Sat, 29 Dec 2007 18:33:55 +0100) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85650 Archived-At: In my book suggesting the use of `setq' to set a variable contradicts the very idea of customizing that variable. There is no contradiction. Both methods can be used for any customizable variable, and both methods are normal.