From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Uninformative comment in files.el Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:10:34 -0500 Message-ID: References: <475EF93E.3060203@ig.com.br> <475F0992.2030307@gmx.at> <475F45EB.2070704@ig.com.br> <476084A9.4010800@ig.com.br> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197627082 28273 80.91.229.12 (14 Dec 2007 10:11:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 10:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Vinicius Jose Latorre Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 14 11:11:33 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J37W0-0001Y0-Hy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:11:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J37Vi-0004Qc-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:11:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J37V8-0003ob-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:10:38 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J37V6-0003lr-9K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:10:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J37V5-0003lg-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:10:35 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J37V5-0001Fw-B1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:10:35 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J37V4-0001Nb-K3; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:10:34 -0500 In-reply-to: <476084A9.4010800@ig.com.br> (message from Vinicius Jose Latorre on Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:02:33 -0300) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:85145 Archived-At: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2005-11/msg01346.html > > > > For the moment I'd strongly propose to revert the change and study the > > problem in more depth. The start of that thread shows the kind of problem that we will fix by making revert-buffer delete overlays. The rest of that thread shows other proposed solutions which are not right. There is no valid argument against making revert-buffer delete overlays. None of these messages actually shows any problem with that change. They do show some problems which that change, alone, won't solve; but those cases have a problem now. I don't see anything that needs to be studied. I think you should reinstall the patch.