From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: byte compiling defcustom Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200711171647.lAHGlHqH024027@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200711172032.lAHKWhgx025030@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200711172041.lAHKf2SG025058@jane.dms.auburn.edu> <200711180413.lAI4DLF8025958@jane.dms.auburn.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195531268 31630 80.91.229.12 (20 Nov 2007 04:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 20 05:01:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IuKIS-00021R-46 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:01:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuKIE-00022C-JG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:00:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuKGi-0001KW-HY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IuKGg-0001IP-T8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IuKGg-0001Hb-Eo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuKGd-0007Nq-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IuKGb-0008Q9-Hc; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:59:17 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Dan Nicolaescu on Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:48:43 -0800) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83700 Archived-At: Good example, it addresses the points I was trying to make: 1. Is there any value in this being a defcustom? IMO, absolutely not. I don't know, but it doesn't affect this issue. It IS a defcustom, and as long as it is a defcustom, it needs to work right. Since there is no important need for this optimization, my decision is not to add it.