From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: suppressing byte-compiler warnings about undefined functions
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:07 -0500
Message-ID: <E1IsV4N-0004E0-D4@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <udejeysyvn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1IquXm-0000PY-M9@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<gid4uhlh75.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<E1IrIZ5-0002Bq-LB@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<ah8x52wzcd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <47396EDD.6020007@gmx.at>
	<aq8x5175o5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1195096072 31788 80.91.229.12 (15 Nov 2007 03:07:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:07:52 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 15 04:07:56 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IsV56-0007kx-Tj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Nov 2007 04:07:53 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IsV4u-0003P0-EM
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:40 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IsV4Q-0002tF-DF
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:10 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IsV4O-0002qY-JB
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:10 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IsV4O-0002qD-Bp
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:08 -0500
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IsV4N-00064O-Sn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:07 -0500
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IsV4N-0004E0-D4; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:07:07 -0500
In-reply-to: <aq8x5175o5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Glenn Morris on
	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:32:58 -0500)
X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:83231
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/83231>

    > `checkdec' will be likely confused more often with `checkdoc'.  I think
    > a different term should be used.

    I suppose it is a bit similar. Any suggestions anyone?

How about `check-declarations'?

People won't call this by hand very often.
The name need not be short.