From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: region-active-p Date: Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:48:20 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ir4lqz2r.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <877il09t4y.fsf@catnip.gol.com> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194122984 30886 80.91.229.12 (3 Nov 2007 20:49:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 20:49:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: reinersteib+gmane@imap.cc, andreas.roehler@online.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, juri@jurta.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, stephen@xemacs.org, drew.adams@oracle.com To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 03 21:49:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IoPw4-0004Zg-12 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:49:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoPvt-0001Yk-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:49:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoPuq-00043w-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:48:24 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IoPup-00041z-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IoPup-00041J-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:48:23 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IoPuo-0008UB-0U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:48:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IoPum-0004gI-7x; Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:48:20 -0400 In-reply-to: <877il09t4y.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (message from Miles Bader on Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:31:25 +0900) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82454 Archived-At: Actually I prefer `region-active-p' too, as long as the slight inconsistency with the xemacs definition is OK (I think it is, personally). The function should have an argument which says whether an empty region should count as "selected". They asked us to use a name that is new.