From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unload-feature questions and thoughts Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <858x6atas5.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192507984 11493 80.91.229.12 (16 Oct 2007 04:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 04:13:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Juanma Barranquero" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 16 06:12:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ihdna-0002JZ-D4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 06:12:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhdnT-0004mv-BQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhdlQ-0003Rr-0x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:40 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IhdlP-0003Qm-4d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhdlO-0003Qd-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhdlO-0005wm-Lm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:38 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IhdlO-0002zv-E0; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:10:38 -0400 In-reply-to: (lekktu@gmail.com) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80981 Archived-At: That's the idea, though for finer-grained control FEATURE-unload-function can always modify `unload-hook-features-list' before returning the "continue the standard processing" flag back to `unload-feature'. How would that be useful? What problem could it solve?