From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.50; Emacs 23.0.50: Segfaults in alloc.c (batch process) Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:57:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20070908031244.C88D412A4546@localhost> <18167.418.786414.408904@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18167.7604.391195.551528@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <18167.44786.436834.508257@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <85zlzbj156.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190743104 23528 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2007 17:58:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:58:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, raman@users.sf.net, emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 25 19:58:19 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IaEfr-0008Pg-3B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:58:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEfo-0004Yi-1t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:58:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEfl-0004YG-An for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEfj-0004Y3-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IaEfj-0004Y0-M0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IaEfj-00015a-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:58:11 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IaEf3-0007c4-Bp; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:57:29 -0400 In-reply-to: <85zlzbj156.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Mon, 24 Sep 2007 21:48:05 +0200) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79823 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:20007 Archived-At: Well, the vast majority of this list isn't blind, and so skimming the context is less time-consuming for them. So it's at least courteous to trim extensively. The main advantage of _selective_ citation is that only the relevant text from the previous message is present. That means less stuff to skip.