From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs
Subject: Re: 23.0.50; emacsclient --eval new behaviour
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:06 -0400
Message-ID: <E1IWmmg-0007km-Eg@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <18154.36545.341976.532025@mail.eng.it>
	<jwvfy1howef.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189921138 20094 80.91.229.12 (16 Sep 2007 05:38:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2007 05:38:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, saint@eng.it
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 16 07:38:54 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1IWmqM-0000eb-JK
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 07:38:54 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IWmqL-0006It-N8
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:38:53 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IWmnC-0004se-Uh
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:39 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IWmnB-0004rF-KI
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:38 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWmnB-0004qx-7i
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:37 -0400
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>) id 1IWmnB-0001Uo-0P
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:37 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <rms@gnu.org>)
	id 1IWmmg-0007km-Eg; Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:35:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <jwvfy1howef.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan
	Monnier on Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:57:47 -0400)
X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79018 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:19888

    Yes, I think that the -c argument should be reversed from "--current-frame"
    to "--create-frame".

    This will bring back the default behavior to (more or less) what it was in
    Emacs-22.1.

Would someone please do it?