From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New start up splash screen annoyance... Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:04:37 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87sl5n5yem.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fy1nbe4f.fsf@jurta.org> <86myvu2zw1.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> <20070912093913.GB12104@saeurebad.de> <87wsuum8qw.fsf@jurta.org> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189843616 28410 80.91.229.12 (15 Sep 2007 08:06:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 08:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, hannes@saeurebad.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 15 10:06:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IWSfu-0003P5-Lh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 10:06:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWSft-0000su-UF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IWSeL-0007r0-2T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IWSeK-0007qW-Dr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IWSeK-0007qS-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:05:08 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IWSeJ-0003A6-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IWSdp-00042C-TT; Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:04:37 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wsuum8qw.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Fri, 14 Sep 2007 02:43:51 +0300) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78951 Archived-At: There are cases where starting Emacs with a file name command line argument is fully justified: for instance, logging into a remote computer only to fix one config file. Many users preferred using vi for such tasks because vi was faster to start. However, on modern hardware emacs startup time is comparable to vi. When I want to do this, I start Emacs and then visit the file. What's the advantage of specifying the file name as a command arg?