From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Split man directory Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:28 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87fy1v36be.fsf@neutrino.caeruleus.net> <877in51myr.fsf@kfs-lx.testafd.dk> <86ir6pbexp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189054961 26241 80.91.229.12 (6 Sep 2007 05:02:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 05:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: angeli@caeruleus.net, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 06 07:02:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IT9Vk-00079P-Rf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 07:02:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9Ve-0006eG-QI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 01:02:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9T7-0003yu-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9T5-0003wq-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT9T5-0003w1-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:51 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT9T3-0004cn-IH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT9Si-0004yI-Ku; Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:59:28 -0400 In-reply-to: <86ir6pbexp.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:10:42 +0200) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77927 Archived-At: > I would suggest doc/userman rather than doc/emacs, as all of the manuals > are about emacs one way or another. I find doc/emacs more appropriate since, after all, emacs.info is generated from the files in that directory. I agree.