From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bumpe unicode2 branch version to 23.0.52 Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:14 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87veaqoj6a.fsf@gmail.com> <68E90D78-2AA7-48C9-9643-68AFE81B33B4@Web.DE> <7tps0y9ebn.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <85zm01iruh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189022714 11827 80.91.229.12 (5 Sep 2007 20:05:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 20:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 05 22:05:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IT17c-0000UP-Gv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:05:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT17b-0000yg-01 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT158-00067A-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:34 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IT157-00063l-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IT156-00063S-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT156-0007XR-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IT14o-00061F-F9; Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:02:14 -0400 In-reply-to: <85zm01iruh.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (message from David Kastrup on Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:49:58 +0200) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:77894 Archived-At: Backing out multitty changes that we decide we don't want, or changing implementation details will be easier if we don't make a major merge from another branch before we are finished with dealing with the pending one. That is true, but I don't think we will have to change anything fundamental in the multi-tty code. We have a few bugs to fix, and need clear documentation. We would only need to back it out if nobody writes the needed documentation.